Always Finance News: Why reviewing the past must be a strategic focus for financial advice firms

TCC Group’s Strategic Regulatory Director, Jason Wintie, examines the FCA’s latest feedback on ongoing advice and what it means for firms’ obligations to review historic advice delivery.

What happened?

As featured in Always Finance News, TCC Group’s Strategic Regulatory Director, Jason Wintie, explored what the FCA’s latest feedback on ongoing advice means for advice firms.

The regulator’s softer tone should not be mistaken for lesser expectations. It made clear that firms still have obligations under the Consumer Duty and the Dispute Resolution: Complaints Sourcebook (DISP) to identify and put right any harm caused to clients.

Why does it matter?

That responsibility is not limited to responding to complaints; it extends to identifying foreseeable harm wherever it may have occurred, including in advice delivered as far back as 2018.

Who is affected?

The analysis is directed at financial advice and wealth management firms, and pensions and retirement income providers, that deliver or have historically delivered ongoing advice services.

Key risks

  • Mistaking the FCA’s softer tone for reduced obligations
  • Failing to identify foreseeable harm beyond client complaints
  • Overlooking advice delivered as far back as 2018

Actions to take

  1. Review historic ongoing advice delivery, not only cases that have generated complaints.
  2. Assess obligations under the Consumer Duty and DISP to identify and put right foreseeable harm.
  3. Extend the review period back to 2018 where advice of this type was delivered.

Recommendations

Firms should treat the FCA’s feedback as confirmation that historic advice review remains a live obligation, not a closed chapter.

Supporting sources

  1. Always Finance News: Why reviewing the past must be a strategic focus for financial advice firms

Frequently asked questions

Does the FCA's softer tone mean lower expectations for firms?

No. The FCA made clear that firms still have obligations under the Consumer Duty and DISP to identify and put right harm caused to clients.

How far back can this obligation extend?

The obligation can extend to advice delivered as far back as 2018.

Is this obligation limited to responding to complaints?

No. Firms must identify and remedy foreseeable harm wherever it may have occurred, not only in response to complaints.

Ready to strengthen your compliance?

Speak to our experts about your regulatory challenges.