IBS Intelligence: Why financial services firms face growing AI governance scrutiny

As AI becomes more deeply embedded across financial services, firms face growing pressure to demonstrate clear accountability, oversight and governance. While existing frameworks such as Consumer Duty, SMCR and operational resilience requirements remain relevant, firms must ensure they can evidence where AI is being used, who remains responsible for decisions and how customer outcomes are being monitored as adoption accelerates.
AI-governance

What happened?

Recently featured in IBS Intelligence, TCC Group CEO Joe Norburn shared his views on the increasing need for accountability as AI becomes more widely adopted across retail banking, payments, lending, insurance and investment services.

The comments follow a recent review examining how AI could reshape retail financial services through 2030 and beyond. The review found that AI is moving beyond basic assistance, with consumers becoming more comfortable relying on automated systems for financial decision-making. Research cited in the review showed that one in five UK adults would be open to AI making financial decisions on their behalf, particularly in areas such as debt advice, pensions and investments.

The review also highlighted a potential disconnect between trust and understanding. Around 26% of consumers said they trust general-purpose AI tools such as ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini for financial advice, despite limited awareness that formal routes to recourse may not apply if those tools provide incorrect guidance.

Why does it matter?

The findings suggest that AI governance is becoming a key area of focus for financial services firms. As consumers place greater trust in AI-driven tools and services, firms must be able to demonstrate that appropriate oversight, accountability and controls remain in place.

The review identifies several risks associated with increased AI adoption, including opaque decision-making, algorithmic bias, AI-enabled fraud and operational vulnerabilities. Firms are therefore under growing pressure to strengthen governance, improve data quality and maintain clear lines of responsibility while continuing to benefit from AI-driven efficiency and innovation.

As AI becomes more influential in customer interactions and financial decision-making, firms may also need to consider whether customers fully understand when decisions are being supported or influenced by automated systems, and how this affects customer outcomes and trust.

Supporting sources

  1. Financial services firms face growing AI governance scrutiny

Frequently asked questions

What governance frameworks apply to AI in financial services?
Existing frameworks such as the Consumer Duty, Senior Managers and Certification Regime (SMCR), and operational resilience requirements remain relevant as firms increase their use of AI across products, services and decision-making processes.
Why is accountability becoming such an important issue for AI?

As AI becomes more deeply embedded in financial services, firms are expected to demonstrate where AI is being used, who is responsible for decision-making, and how customer outcomes are being monitored and governed.

What are the key risks associated with AI adoption?
The review highlights risks including opaque decision-making, algorithmic bias, AI-enabled fraud and operational vulnerabilities. Firms must strengthen oversight and controls to manage these risks while benefiting from AI-driven innovation.

Ready to strengthen your compliance?

Speak to our experts about your regulatory challenges.