FCA CP26/28: What the AIFM regime reforms mean for wealth managers and firms

The FCA’s proposed AIFM reforms highlight a wider regulatory shift towards proportionate regulation, stronger governance and better-quality reporting. While the direct impact on many wealth managers may be limited, the changes could enhance the information firms use to support due diligence, Consumer Duty oversight and evidence-based decision-making.

AIFM-TCC

What happened?

The FCA has launched consultation CP26/28, proposing significant reforms to the UK Alternative Investment Fund Manager (AIFM) regime. The proposals aim to create a more proportionate, flexible and UK-specific framework, replacing elements of the existing regime inherited from the EU. The reforms would introduce a more tailored approach based on firm size, activities and risk profile, alongside changes to reporting, disclosures, governance expectations and oversight arrangements. Implementation is currently envisaged for 2028 following consultation, further FCA rulemaking and supporting Treasury legislation.

Why does it matter?

Although implementation is not currently envisaged until 2028, the consultation provides an important indication of the FCA’s regulatory direction. The proposals reflect a broader regulatory trend towards proportionate regulation, improved governance, better quality reporting and stronger evidence-based decision-making. Firms should view the reforms not just as an asset management issue, but as part of a wider shift towards demonstrating effective oversight and customer outcomes.

Who is affected?

The reforms will directly affect UK-authorised and UK-registered AIFMs, firms marketing alternative investment funds in the UK, depositaries, prime brokers, delegates of AIFMs and investors in alternative investment funds. However, wealth managers, advisers and governance teams may also see indirect impacts through changes to the reporting, disclosures and governance information provided by asset managers.

Key risks

  • Missing early signals about future regulatory expectations and governance standards.
  • Failing to assess how reporting and disclosure changes could affect due diligence processes.
  • Reliance on governance and management information that may not evolve in line with regulatory expectations.
  • Insufficient consideration of how future reporting enhancements could support Consumer Duty oversight.
  • Governance committees being unprepared for changes in the wider regulatory landscape.

Actions to take

  1. Monitor consultation developments and implementation timelines.
  2. Engage with asset management providers to understand potential reporting and disclosure changes.
  3. Review how current provider information supports governance, due diligence and oversight activities.
  4. Assess whether future reporting enhancements could strengthen Consumer Duty monitoring.
  5. Keep governance committees informed about the likely direction of regulatory travel.
  6. Track developments in both FCA reforms and related Treasury legislative changes.

 

Wider implications

The consultation reinforces the FCA’s broader focus on simplifying regulation while maintaining regulatory outcomes. Across multiple supervisory themes, firms are increasingly expected to demonstrate how governance bodies use management information to identify risks, challenge assumptions and evidence decision-making. Improved reporting and oversight information could help firms strengthen governance frameworks, value assessments, product oversight and Consumer Duty reviews. However, simplification should not be mistaken for reduced accountability. Firms will still be expected to demonstrate sound judgement, effective controls and robust governance.

Recommendations

The consultation closes on 14th October 2026, with implementation currently envisaged for 2028 following consultation feedback, a further FCA consultation on remaining areas, final rules and associated Treasury legislative reforms.

In the meantime, firms should consider:

  • Monitoring consultation developments and implementation timelines
  • Engaging with key asset management providers to understand potential changes
  • Reviewing how provider reporting currently supports governance and due diligence activities
  • Assessing whether future reporting enhancements could strengthen Consumer Duty oversight
  • Keeping governance committees informed about the likely direction of travel

Supporting sources

  1. The UK AIFM Regime

Frequently asked questions

What is CP26/28?

CP26/28 is the FCA’s consultation on a new UK regulatory framework for Alternative Investment Fund Managers. The proposals are intended to create a more proportionate and flexible regime while maintaining appropriate consumer and market protections. 

Who is directly affected?

UK-authorised and UK-registered AIFMs, firms marketing alternative investment funds in the UK, residual collective investment scheme operators, depositaries, prime brokers, delegates of AIFMs, firms considering entering the UK alternative investment market, trade bodies and investors in alternative investment funds. 

When could the new regime take effect?

The FCA currently envisages implementation in 2028, following consultation feedback, further rulemaking and associated Treasury reforms. 

Why should wealth managers care about an AIFM consultation?

The reforms could influence the reporting, governance information and disclosures provided by asset managers, which may support stronger product governance, due diligence and Consumer Duty oversight processes. 

Is the FCA changing the AIFM regime now?

No. CP26/28 is a consultation. The FCA is seeking feedback on proposed reforms before introducing final rules. Implementation is currently envisaged for 2028, subject to consultation feedback and legislative changes. 

Ready to strengthen your compliance?

Speak to our experts about your regulatory challenges.