Implementing the Consumer Duty: what are the foreseeable challenges?

TCC Associate Director Neil Dethick discusses the operational challenges and new standards of care associated with the transition to the FCA’s Consumer Duty in FT Adviser.

What happened?

The FCA’s Consumer Duty introduces higher standards of care across the entire customer lifecycle, replacing the previous ‘Treating Customers Fairly’ (TCF) requirements. This transition poses complex operational and cultural shifts for regulated firms.

Writing in FT Adviser, TCC Associate Director Neil Dethick identifies four critical operational complications that businesses should address to prevent implementation delays and ensure compliance.

Why does it matter?

Unlike previous regimes, the Consumer Duty requires proactive evidence of good outcomes across products, pricing, comprehension, and customer support. Moving beyond simple disclosure to active monitoring and vulnerability tracking presents significant system and data integration hurdles for traditional compliance operations.

Supporting sources

  1. Implementing the Consumer Duty: what are the foreseeable challenges?

Frequently asked questions

How does the Consumer Duty differ from Treating Customers Fairly?

The Consumer Duty is a much more demanding standard, requiring proactive, data-led evidence that clients are receiving fair value and good outcomes, rather than just proof of fair procedures.

What are the common operational challenges in implementing the Duty?

Firms typically struggle with data collection, tracking customer comprehension, integrating vulnerability metrics, and establishing continuous, end-to-end customer journey monitoring.

Ready to strengthen your compliance?

Speak to our experts about your regulatory challenges.